If you have been searching for contract management software, you have almost certainly come across Ironclad. It is well-known, well-funded, and genuinely impressive if your business has a legal team with the time and budget to make the most of it.
But what if you don't?
What if contracts in your business currently live in your inbox, and the closest thing you have to a tracking system is a spreadsheet someone set up two years ago? That is the reality for a lot of founders and business leaders, and it is exactly the situation Miova was built for.
This comparison breaks down the key differences between Miova and Ironclad so you can make the right call for where your business actually is right now.
Ironclad is an enterprise-grade Contract Lifecycle Management (CLM) platform. It is trusted by large companies like L'Oreal, Asana, and OpenAI, and it covers the full contract journey from first draft through to post-signature tracking.
Ironclad is a serious piece of software built for serious legal operations. If you have a dedicated legal or procurement team managing hundreds of complex contracts across multiple departments, it can be a genuine game-changer.
The honest trade-off with Ironclad is that it is built for enterprise, and that shows in just about every way.
Pricing is custom and not published publicly, but third-party data consistently puts the entry point at around $25,000 to $30,000 per year, with most real-world deployments running significantly higher once implementation, onboarding, and additional modules are factored in.
Beyond cost, there is the setup reality. Ironclad requires configuration, internal ownership, and structured onboarding. Reviews on G2 and Capterra regularly flag a steep learning curve and the difficulty of finding older contracts once the system is up and running.
For a founder or operations lead at a growing SME, that is a lot to take on when the actual problem you are trying to solve is far simpler: where are all my contracts, and when do they renew?
Miova is a contract tracking and management platform designed for businesses that have contracts already signed and need a better way to manage them.
The focus is not on drafting or negotiation. It is on what happens after the ink is dry: visibility, renewal reminders, and having one place where every contract in your business actually lives.
The email forwarding feature in particular removes the biggest barrier most SMEs face when trying to get organised: the admin. There is no manual data entry, no uploading process to navigate, no fields to fill in. You forward the contract, and it is done.
Miova is not trying to replace Ironclad for enterprise legal teams. It is solving a different problem entirely.
If your contracts are scattered, your renewals are at risk, and you need to get on top of things without a six-month implementation project, Miova is built for that.
| Miova | Ironclad | |
|---|---|---|
| Best for | SMEs needing contract visibility | Enterprise legal teams |
| Primary use case | Post-signature tracking and reminders | Full contract lifecycle management |
| Pricing | From $29/month | From ~$25,000/year |
| Setup time | Minutes | Weeks to months |
| Contract drafting | No | Yes |
| Renewal reminders | Yes, automated | Yes, within broader platform |
| Email forwarding to upload | Yes | No |
| AI data extraction | Yes, on all plans | Yes, on higher tiers |
| Learning curve | Low | High |
| Target user | Founders, ops leads, procurement managers | Legal ops, general counsel |
This is worth spending a moment on, because it is easy to get drawn into evaluating features you will never use.
You probably need Ironclad if:
You probably need Miova if:
The reality for most SMEs is that the gap they need to close is not about drafting better contracts. It is about knowing what contracts they have, what they commit to, and when those contracts are up for renewal.
Miova is transparent about pricing because that matters to the businesses it serves.
All plans include AI data extraction, the email forwarding feature, the smart dashboard, and renewal notifications.
Ironclad does not publish pricing. Based on independently reported data, most businesses pay between $25,000 and $75,000 per year, before implementation and support costs.
Ironclad is genuinely one of the best enterprise CLM platforms available. If you have the team, the budget, and the contract complexity to justify it, it delivers real value.
But for the vast majority of SMEs, the challenge is not managing contract lifecycle complexity. It is simply staying on top of what has already been signed.
That is the problem Miova solves, and it solves it without the enterprise price tag, the long implementation, or the learning curve.
If your contracts are currently living in someone's inbox and renewal dates are tracked on a spreadsheet, the right tool is the one you will actually use. Miova is built to be exactly that.
Get started for free at miova.io